Shorts
Can the Archive Make a Monster of a Historian?
|
A historian who pays full attention to their sources can’t help but be transformed into a monster…
A historian who pays full attention to their sources can’t help but be transformed into a monster…
as gluttonous as a pig, as angry as a lion, as quarrelsome as a dog
A companion list for lit studies scholars.
When you’re shopping for books this season, consider a contingent scholar.
Reflections on a year spent teaching history at the United States Military Academy
What could be more satisfying than immersing yourself in the history of something you love?
Long before it was fashionable, Bloomer pioneered what would later be dubbed “respectability politics”
A visit to the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture
the intelligence individuals are less James Bond and George Smiley than bureaucrats
Dead for centuries, the bees can help save their living descendants
though in an idyllic setting, I was poised above a mass grave.
myths fed back as stereotypes and strawmen to divine some boundary for acceptability
The archive my colleagues and I have built and maintained since 2012 is inaccessible.
A destroyed car at the entrance is hardly a sign that the archive is near.
People are genuinely curious about the past and excited to encounter it in unexpected ways.
There are so many wonderful opportunities in this field. Sometimes, you create your own.
When I tell people I’m a consulting public historian, this is how they respond.
“I was fortunate to do graduate school during the height of academic blogging.”
“I do not understand why you take the trouble to consume this bulk material to sustain yourselves.”
Even within an uncaring government bureaucracy, one person could make a difference.
How someone already convinced of a conspiracy theory reads non-conspiratorial sources.