Shorts
A Profession, If You Can Keep It
|
Imagined meritocracies mean little to extractive institutions.
Thomas Hearne, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
The peculiarities and problems of higher education.
Imagined meritocracies mean little to extractive institutions.
Frankly, even if I could, I wouldn’t want to.
“I want my reader to enjoy reading it as much as I want to challenge myself writing it.”
Scholars of science, technology, and medicine who are building a new community from the ground up.
If an academic couple can’t get a partner hire, they’re faced with a life-changing choice.
Publishing off the tenure-track is possible, but not without its challenges.
I had already completed my freshman year when I first learned what an adjunct was.
The pandemic has shown what happens when universities assume they don’t need to answer to graduate students.
Loving an alcoholic who is a renowned expert on substance abuse is debilitating.
“I wrote my entire dissertation between the hours of 10 PM and 3 AM.”
My agency in choosing modes of expression must extend to my students.
What is the purpose of education? Is it just to fill jobs with skilled workers?
Just as Gannon calls for seeing students as humans we can trust, we also need to humanize and trust adjuncts.
The book is a call to arms, and more necessary than ever.
“No one listens unless we tell a good story, so we try to tell good stories.”
After finishing a doctoral program, the goal for many has always been a tenure-track job offer. But what about really terrible offers?
The SHEAR controversy has only exposed structural problems within the wider historical profession.
How is the pandemic shaping the work of history and the lives of those who do that work?
This is the way the American century ends.
Packs of historians roam the streets, name tags flapping in the breeze, only to disappear into hotel conference rooms for hours at a time. What are they doing in there? And why?
What happens when academics collaborate with the restaurant industry? Good things (and better food).
Is philosophy uniquely hostile to trans people? No. It is hostile to marginalized people in general.
Philosophy has long been something done to trans people, not by them.
Why do historians go to archives? Hasn’t everything already been digitized?
In general, academic writing doesn’t earn you anything, and most of the time, it costs you.
Their jobs and salaries may differ, but you should still call them “Professor.”